Monday, November 10, 2008

Non Malay PM?


By Syed Akbar Ali

First a report from The Star

Sunday November 9,2008 MYT 5:34:00 PM

Non-Chinese PM for Singapore?

SINGAPORE: The predominantly Chinese republic here may have a non-Chinese prime minister one day but that is unlikely to happen any time soon, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said on Saturday, four days after Americans elected their first black president. Lee said race was still a factor that determines voters’ preferences here, although he noted that attitudes have shifted.

He was replying to a question from Association of Muslim Professionals board member Yang Razali Kassim at a dialogue with 350 Malay grassroots and community leaders at the Grassroots Club. Yang Razali asked if, in the light of Barack Obama’s win, Singapore was ready for a prime minister of a minority race, and specifically from the Malay-Muslim community.

Lee said in reply: “It’s possible. It depends on how people vote, on who has the confidence of the population.” “Will it happen soon? I don’t think so, because you have to win votes. And these sentiments -- who votes for whom, and what makes him identify with that person -- these are sentiments which will not disappear completely for a long time, even if people do not talk about it, even if people wish they did not feel it.”

However, he also acknowledged that attitudes towards race have shifted in the last two to three decades. “Attitudes have shifted because English provides more of a common ground, because the new generation is better educated and they can see that there are successful people of all races,” he said.

“But to reach a position where everybody is totally race-blind and religion-blind, I think that’s very difficult. You will not find it in any country in the world.” Grassroots volunteer Muhammad Nabil Noor Mohamed, 20, said Lee’s assessment is realistic, but he also believes that people of his generation can see beyond race and religion “to assess a leader on his ability and his merit.”

Last year, a survey of 1,824 Singaporeans’ views on inter-racial ties by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies found that 94% of Chinese polled said they would not mind an Indian as prime minister, and 91% said they would not mind a Malay in the top post.

Lee prefaced his remarks on Singapore by noting that Obama’s election victory marked a “historic change” for America. But the win did not mean race was no longer an issue there, he said. He pointed out that after 20 years of Bush and Clinton presidencies, Americans wanted a change.

“People were tired, they wanted something different, and Mr Obama represented something different,” he said. “He was an effective, charismatic candidate and able to mobilise young people and enthuse them, inspire them.” Obama won 52% of the popular vote against opponent John McCain’s 46%, but a closer look at how ethnic groups voted showed that race remained a factor, Lee said. Just 43% of whites voted for Obama, compared with 60-65% of Latinos and Asians and 95% of blacks. “To say that’s socio-economic, nothing to do with race, I don’t think so,” Lee said.

Well I agree with Mr Lee Jr. But first let me talk about my experience with American redneck, hicksville type racism. A hick is a backwoods, uneducated country hick. A redneck refers to a rough labourer or farmhand - again someone who is not cultured or educated. Not that there is much culture in America in the first place.

You have not seen blatant racism untill you are in the United States. It is a really prejudiced, brain dead type of racism. I went to University in the United States from 1982 to 1986. I studied in Indiana for three years and then moved to the University of Oklahoma for my final year. Indiana was an ok place. The white folks were usually a very friendly lot. I would run into the odd racist at the gas station, in class and maybe at the mall. Nothing serious. But I had plenty of white friends and used to get invited for dinner at their homes. I used to hang out with white people. They are just normal people like any of us.

In September 1985 I got married in Kuala Lumpur. Then in January 1986, my wife and I returned to the US to continue our studies in Oklahoma. The tuition fees were much cheaper than in Indiana. But from the day we arrived in Oklahoma I noticed something very obvious. The white people there were all crazy racists, almost to a man. We went apartment hunting. This white guy showed us some apartments without speaking a word or answering any of my questions.

On two occasions, when I was coming back from class, white people threw empty beer cans in my direction. The neighbourhood kids would make racist remarks. In class, many of the professors were blatant racists. In economics class one professor veered from the topic and started arguing that slavery actually cost the Southern planters more money! If you went to a restaurant the white folks would stare at you like jakuns (lower case 'j' ok).

My wife first attended a 2 year community college which was run by a Church. It was predominantly white. There were black students there who had been kept back for up to three years because they kept failing in things like Speech class, music class (African Americans failing music!) and so on which were graded subjectively by white teachers. I thought this was odd. This was the American south. Hicksville and redneck town rolled into one. This was in the 1980s. Looking at Obama's losses in most of the redneck States, I think this racism has not changed.

But there was a major positive side to my stay in Oklahoma. When I transferred to the University of Oklahoma I had 58 credits left to earn my degree - about 19 courses to complete. Normally it would take four semesters (2 years) to complete 58 credits of coursework. But I disliked Oklahoma so much (plus I did not want my wife to be exposed to any unnecessary risk) I completed the 58 credits in 10 months. I did this by taking extra heavy workloads and also 'testing out' of some courses. This means instead of taking the course, you read the textbook and take a test. If you pass the test with a certain grade, then you are exempted from taking the full course. It was an extremely busy 10 months for me. The heavy work load meant my grades were none too great but I did complete the 58 credits.

I recall that after I took my tests I had to go to the Student Affair's office to update them (I would NOT be signing up for any more classes the next semester) as I had completed all my requirements and would be graduating 'early'. The obviously racist white guy at the Registry started yelling at me and said it was impossible for anyone to complete 58 credits in one year. But that is exactly what I had done.

I went to see the Foreign Students Advisor (a Mexican woman) as well as one faculty advisor (who was also white but ok) and complained to them about the guy at Student Affairs. This seemed to do the trick and everything went well after that - or so I thought. I even took a risk and without waiting for the results of a last test (I was confident I would pass) my wife and I flew home in December 1986. A couple of weeks later a Malaysian friend posted the results of my last test - which I had passed.

Then to my horror, soon after that, I received a letter in Bangsar, Kuala Lumpur from Student Affairs at the University of Oklahoma, saying that I 'could not be graduated' because I had not completed one course. I wrote back to them , citing the test results which I already had with me and told them to update their records and to please mail to me my degree asap. I received my degree in the mail some time after that. I like to think that till this day I am among few students at the U of Oklahoma who completed 58 credits worth of coursework in just 10 months.

That was my personal experience with American style racism. We also suffer racism and prejudice here in Malaysia but it is not of the blatant and potentially violent type they have in America. The white people are ready to kill you if they do not like your colour. Here if Chan is racist, Tan could be your brother in law, if Shafie is racist, Faisal could be your lifelong friend, if Kumar is racist, Ravi could be your business partner.

Only the inept, unintelligent, lack of knowledge, not enough learning, and bankrupt of ideas politicians make a fuss about race, but really at the ground level, Malaysians are relaxed.

The majority of American voters are still white. So the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency is a good sign that the whites in America have learnt to look beyond race and colour. Only 43% of whites voted for Obama but since their absolute numbers are still very large, the white vote is significant.

About electing a minority person as leader - I think the same will go for Singapore. And eventually the same will apply in Malaysia. People will look beyond race and colour if they think that the candidate will protect and provide for them.

A lawyer friend told me that after Obama won the Presidency, Mr Lim Kit Siang stated in Parliament that some sort of congratulations should be recorded about Obama's achievement in being the first African American to be elected President of the United States. Mr Lim then wondered aloud when a Chinese, an Indian, a Kadazan or Iban would become the Prime Minister of Malaysia. One UMNO/BN backbencher retorted that it was no big deal because Malaysia already had a Prime Minister who was Indian. He was obviously referring to Tun Dr Mahathir's Indian father.

Personally I have the greatest confidence that a Chinese, Indian, Kadazan or anyone can be elected as Prime Minister of Malaysia - and maybe in the not too distant future. But such an individual must be seen as the protector and provider for all Malaysians - each according to his needs.

I am chosing my words very carefully here because the Penan's needs are very different from mine or yours. The needs of the Chinese are different from the Sulus or the poor Indians in the estates. The needs of the Malays, the Sabah and Sarawak bumiputras and the poor Indians are similar but not exactly the same. So we need a juggler as the Prime Minister. A smart, kind hearted, technically capable juggler who can deliver what the various people of this country need - for them to achieve wealth and happiness.

In the US, Obama is seen as someone will be the protector and provider for all Americans. He is expected to be able to juggle the needs of many.

The appearance of a Juggler like this is NOT dependent on other people. If we have many such persons it is good but we need just one person. It depends on the individual. Do we have such persons in this country? Are you such a person? What about your children?

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Syed Akhbar,

Tell us more of the racism you faced in US - at retail outlets, cinemas, etc. In KL, i once failed to borrow a book from the university library because of my skin colour and it was an important book that can't be bought with money then. The librarian just said 'orang @@@@ kaya, pergi beli dari kedai buku!' and the book was not available at any of the bookshops in KL!

temenggong said...

Everything in Malaysia goes on a race basis, as that has been drilled into the people, especially the malays, with the fateful introduction of Article 153. That has to be removed first, for the racial mindset to change. This would be a precondition for nonmalays to the PM, or any other senior position in the govt, be it a general or Chief Justice.

In the USA there is no racism in the constitution and laws. In Malaysia it is there! Making it worse. Further, this is coupled with religious bigotry. All of these have to be removed first.

Of course there are any number of persons who could be PM, you and me included, and satisfy the wishes of the people. I do not think it requires juggling. It requires non marginalisation policies as well as institutions that provide checks and balances, including the free press and transparency. Because the basic needs of every race is the same - a sound education, as well as jobs!

Anonymous said...

Syed,
It sounded like u had a "hell of a time" in Norman. I graduated from OSU and the whites over in Stillwater seem fine to me.
U still had not given a solid racism example in your posting. Refusing to answer your enquiries on apartment was rude rather it a sign of racism itself.
Could you be over sensitive?

Nadia said...

in the US you have racist people,but here you have racist government policies. which form is racism is more blatant?

Anonymous said...

Maybe in 1985, the Americans were racists. Today, nearly 23 years later, the Americans cannot afford to be racists.

Just like the Banglas and Indons, who have taken over the business in Petaling Street and Nilai Tiga Textile Walk, the Chinese have surely taken over the running of businesses in America (well organised tours within America,hotels and restaurants)and the Indians have taken over the CEO posts, the IT Industry, the medical profession and critical broadcasting positions in America.

Have you taken a ride on the Hop On Hop Off bus in New York? "We are now apploaching the Lockefella Centre or The Lock". This next sentence nearly killed me with laughter...." There it is. The Statue of Literby." I do not think it was spoonerism because the Statue of Literby was with us even after the boat ride to Ellis Island and at another point when The Lady came into view as we took our coach back to the Hotel. Mind you there were Americans from the west coast, I dont mean Perak and Penang but Los Angeles and other western states, in the coach with us. I, as a foreign tourist or "alien" laughed it off. The west coast Americans were embarassed to take such crap about their beloved New York from a "born again' American. But what to do? They do not want to do such menial jobs like tourist guides on these Hop On Hop Off buses. So they have to stomach the aliens who are now green carded Americans. They cannot afford to be racists.

Boutiques, supermarkets and stores are manned by African Americans. They are good, polite and efficient. Of course the people from the Middle East have also comfortably taken root in America. Do not think Mainland Chinese are the only yellow Asians there in America. The place is crawling with Vietnamese, Koreans and Japanese. They are all there. Mind you they are not students doing part time. They are all green carded Americans.I interacted with any "colored" (meaning all colors of the rainbow) I encountered.

The Land of The Free. In reality, America is the Land of the Free. I thought Malaysia was a unique country with three different races and so many religions and that the Government should be applauded for managing such a melting pot. My eyes literally popped out when I saw the diversity of races in America.

America is indeed a nice place. As in all places, there are cranky people with cranky ideologies but these cranky people in time to come have to change to accomodate the changing environment around them. For the environment changes and no one can control it. With time, whether man likes it or not, the environment makes man change and adjust and adapt to the changing environment.That has happened and is happening in America. That is why Obama was elected President.

Jahamy said...

temenggong,

I am curious....wh do you single out Article 153? You do not think that the orang aslis and the natives of sabah and sarawak do not require any affirmative action or preferential treatment?

What about the other factors such as the vernacular schools, insistence on one's own culture and identity and so on? I think in America there is no insistence on racial identity.... even Obama can be considered to have assimilated into the "American culture". After 50 years of independence, you think the Malaysians have assimilated into a "Malaysian culture"?

temenggong said...

Dear Jahamy,

Article 153 is a race based affirmative action proviso. It has lead to division, a two tier rakyat, outright racism as well as a worrying and dangerous thinking that malays are natives and non malays are not native.

It would be better to replace Article 153 with a need based affirmative action proviso in a social welfare orientated society. This cuts away the racism and division of peoples into two-tiers.

It was agreed earlier on that everyone shall promote their own cultures and languages. Malaysia is supposed to be a multicultural and multi lingual society. That is what was agreed. And not monolingual and mono cultural. It is supposed to be multi and hybrid over time. But that is what umno is resisting.

This does not mean there is no single identity. Multiculturalism and Multilingualism is our Malaysian identity.

But many people, umnomalays, are thinking that all malaysians must speak malay only and attend national malays schools only, and only then we will have a one identity. This is wrong.

temenggongPS said...

Dear Jahamy,

Article 153 is a race based affirmative action proviso. It has led to division, a two tier rakyat, outright racism as well as a worrying and dangerous thinking that malays are natives and non malays are not native.

It would be better to replace Article 153 with a need based affirmative action proviso in a social welfare orientated society. This cuts away the racism and division of peoples into two-tiers.

It was agreed earlier on that everyone shall promote their own cultures and languages. Malaysia is supposed to be a multicultural and multi lingual society. That is what was agreed. And not monolingual and monocultural. It is supposed to be multi, and hybrid over time. But that is what umno is resisting.

This does not mean there is no single identity. Multiculturalism and Multilingualism is our Malaysian identity.

But many people, umnomalays, are thinking that all malaysians must speak malay only and attend national malays schools only, and only then we will have a one identity. This is wrong.

PS
Syed, the blog has to less restrictive so that I can properly participate and post. Only then we can have a meaningful discussion. Too many of my posts are being censored. Thanks.

Syed Akbar Ali said...

Temenggong said: "Syed, the blog has to less restrictive so that I can properly participate and post. Only then we can have a meaningful discussion. Too many of my posts are being censored. Thanks."

Salam Temenggong. I have deleted one comment of yours, one from another friend of mine Gunumaro - both of which touched on sensitive religious issues. I think you know which religion I am referring to.

Some people send me comments but say they are private and not to be posted. Those too I have deleted. Other than that pretty much everything else goes through.

I must say that you have repeated many times your views re Malays, immigrants etc. From the number of comments being addressed to you, it is obvious that your views are getting through.

Whether a view is meaningful or not is best left to the readers to decide. I am getting busy running this Blog. Dont know if this is what I had in mind. I have to read every comment!

Views should be based on truth, logic or common sense. If all three are present then it is even better. These have a better chance of being heard and believed.

Unfortunately upholding views which are not true, illogical and defy common sense harm the upholder more than the beholders. One can become quite mired - and to no avail.

Regards. SAA.

jon pour do care said...

I do not know whether in USA there is no racism in the constitution and laws, but I am very sure somewhere in their books that give them the rights to decide who should live and who should be killed in this world ! What are we gonna call that eh !

In USA, they speak english (american english la !) and goes to english school. Ada Italian school ka..tau Greek school ka..tau Indian school ke..tau African school ke..tau Spanish school ka.....!

Di Malaysia, bila minta gi sekolah malay national school, tak leh...racist gitu..!
Suruh cakap bahasa malay..takleh..racist gitu..!
Tapi hendak gak gi sekolah bukan malay...nak gak cakap bahasa bukan malay....!

Di Amerika, dia orang tak cakap pun macam tu !

Heran gak ! Di Malaysia ni..kalau cakap hak malays...kira racist le tu..!
Payah gak ye jadi malays yek..!