IRAN CRISIS - 28 MILLION PEOPLE WITHOUT WATER

 

Their gods have cursed them. When it rains it pours!

 

 

WHY THE BRITS WILL NOT TRY TO ASSASSINATE DONALD TRUMP

 'That makes for an unstable world'.

 

Here is some more hysteria and war propaganda from the Brits:

OSTB: Collusion between Trump and Putin?

• Did Churchill ever break into applause at the sight of Stalin, 
• or JFK give a little ovation for Khrushchev? 
• striking to see Donald Trump’s thrilled reaction 
• as Vladimir Putin approached him in Alaska last week
• cynics joked it was natural that the American leader clapped: 
• it’s not every day you get to meet your hero. 
• Mr Trump has shown an abiding affection for Mr Putin 
• the real collusion between the two men.
• Mr Trump is drawn to anyone who exudes an aura of strength. 
• He yearns to strike bold and quick deals with tough guys 
• and to win prizes and adoration as a result. 
• That makes for an unstable world.

My Comments: That last sentence 'That makes for an unstable world' is a threat.

The British Poofter also made some nonsensical statements about Russia. He says NATO's Article 5 type "security guarantees" which he wants for the Ukraine should be extended to Europe and to the UK. Here is a one minute video:

Why the hell do Europe and the UK need Article 5 type security guarantees? The UK and Europe are already members of NATO whereby all NATO member countries are already covered by Article 5 of NATO.

"Article 5 is the cornerstone of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)'s collective defence principle, stating that an armed attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. This means that each member is obligated to take "such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force" to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. NATO has invoked Article 5 only once in its history, following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States".

So Article 5 of NATO has already been invoked after the 9-11 event. Why does the Poofter want yet another Article 5 security guarantee? And for himself !!

There is only one answer. Article 5 is a backdoor entry into NATO for Ukraine. Article 5 security guarantees extended to Ukraine are absolutely critical for the UK and Europe to declare war on Russia.  None of them can fight Russia by themselves - it will be suicide. But they want to entrap the United States into fighting Russia for them. Exactly like how they have sacrificed 1.8 Million Ukrainian lives thus far to fight Russia. They dont care about Ukraine or how many Ukrainians will die.

Somebody makes money out of these wars and hostilities. The bankers, the weapons makers, the industrialists. They must keep the wars going. 

WHY THE BRITS WILL NOT TRY TO ASSASSINATE DONALD TRUMP?

Because then Vice President JD Vance will become President of the United States of America. JD Vance is TEN TIMES the hawk than Donald Trump. If JD Vance becomes US President, which he will one day, he will most certainly pull the United States out of NATO. He might bomb the UK - in retaliation for the Brits burning down the White House and the Capitol in Washington in 1814.

British forces under Major General Robert Ross captured Washington, D.C. on August 24, 1814, following their victory at the Battle of Bladensburg, and burned several government buildings, including the Capitol and the White House. The troops used torches and gunpowder to set fire to these structures. The British departed after a mysterious, violent thunderstorm extinguished the fires and dispersed their remaining forces.

So it is in the interests of the British to make sure Donald Trump remains alive and healthy. They will not be able to handle JD Vance. Or his Indian wife. 

AGI IDUP PEMUDA DAYAK

  

 

NEGARA HUKUM? RULE OF LAW? NFA? BAJU HITAM?

 

Apa Gomo cakap ini pasal zaman kami cybertrooper UMNO dulu is very correct. Kami bertarung, berlaga, bersaing dalam gelanggan politik. You tibai us we tibai you. Yang best sekali hentam Pas. Kita hentam Pas kuat-kuat. Pas pun hentam kita kuat-kuat. It was politics. 

Tak pernah sesiapa pun serang sesiapa secara fizikal atau ugut atau ancam keselamatan peribadi sesiapa pun. Especially under Dr Mahathir. 

Among the earliest cybertrooper websites set up by Umno at that time (2000-2001??) was 'Intelligensia'. Dr Mahathir's instruction was 'Do not break the law'.  Maksudnya nak cyberwarfare ke cybertrooper ke tapi dont break the law.

Tak boleh ugut orang ke, mengancam keselamatan orang ke, guna kekerasan - itu semua tak boleh. Itu kisah dulu. That was then. Sekarang sudah lain.

 

KLIK DI SINI 

AHLI POLITIK PAR*@ DENGAN MAINAN POLITIK PAR*@ MEREKA.

 

 

KLIK DI SINI 

PROTESTS IN IRAN, AIRSPACE STILL CLOSED

Massive protests are taking place in Iran as you are reading this. Families, middle aged men and women,  older people are out on the streets protesting that there is no electricity, no regular water supplies, not getting paid on time or not getting paid at all. Iranians are undergoing very tough times.

Iranian air space is still closed - more than two months after the short war between Iran and Israel in June 2025. You can see flightradar24.com from this morning which shows most international flights flying around Iranian airspace. There are some flights overflying Iran. There are no flights going into Teheran International airport.

 

 

To keep up appearances the ayatollahs have organised an exhibition of  full sized montages of dead people  in the airport terminal building. You can see in the picture below cardboard cutouts of Hassan Nasrallah the leader of the Lebanese Hezbollah who was killed in Beirut. Behind him are life sized cutouts of other Iranian military men and nuclear scientists who have been killed so far.

This morbid exhibition will also attract some people to visit the airport terminal, thus giving it a sense of being busy. But there are no international flights and domestic flights are limited as well.

The Iranian airspace is still controlled by the Israelis.

US CLOSE TO BANNING MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AS TERRORIST ORGANISATION

Here is some news about the Muslim Brotherhood from the Los Angeles Times:

 

Label the Muslim Brotherhood’s branches as terrorist organizations

On Tuesday, New York City radio host Sid Rosenberg asked Secretary of State Marco Rubio about whether the State Department intends to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as terrorist organizations. Rubio responded that “all of that is in the works,” although “obviously there are different branches of the Muslim Brotherhood, so you’d have to designate each one of them.”

Logistics and bureaucracy aside: It’s about time.

• For far too long, the United States has treated the Muslim Brotherhood with a dangerous combination of naiveté and willful blindness. 
• The Brotherhood is not a random innocuous political movement with a religious bent. 
• It is, and has been since its founding about a century ago, the ideological wellspring of modern Sunni Islamism. 
• The Brotherhood’s fingerprints are on jihadist groups as wide-ranging as Al Qaeda and Hamas, yet successive American administrations — Republican and Democratic alike — have failed to designate its various offshoots for what they are: terrorist organizations.

That failure is not merely academic. It has real-world consequences. By refusing to label the Muslim Brotherhood accurately, we tie our own hands in the fight against Islamism — both at home and abroad. We allow subversive actors to exploit our political system and bankroll extremism under the guise of “cultural” or “charitable” outreach.

Enough is enough.

Founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated mission has never wavered: the establishment of a global caliphate governed by sharia law. The Brotherhood has always attempted to position itself as a “political” organization, but it is “political” in the way Lenin was political. Think subversion through infiltration — or revolution through stealth.

Consider Hamas. Hamas is not merely inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood — it is the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian-Arab branch. The link is unambiguous; as Article Two of Hamas’ founding charter states, “The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine.” And Hamas’ charter also makes clear its penchant for explicit violence: “Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.”

This is not the rhetoric of nuance or moderation. This is the ideological foundation of contemporary jihadism. Yet, while Hamas is rightly designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department, other branches of the Muslim Brotherhood remain off the list.

Why? Because Western elites have allowed themselves to be duped by the Brotherhood’s two-faced strategy. Abroad, they openly sow the seeds of jihad, cheer for a global caliphate and preach for the destruction of Israel and Western civilization more broadly. But in the corridors of power in the U.S. and Europe, they and their Qatari paymasters don suits and ties, rebrand as “moderates” and leverage media credulity and overly generous legal protections to plant ideological roots.

What’s more, CAIR — an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in U.S. history — has extremely well-documented ties to the Brotherhood. And yet CAIR agents continue to operate freely in the United States, masquerading as civil rights advocates while pushing Islamist narratives that undermine the core constitutional principles of equality that they purport to champion. Today, almost two years after CAIR-linked Hamas executed the Oct. 7 pogrom in Israel, CAIR remains in good standing with many elected Democrats.

It shouldn’t be so. In November 2014, the United Arab Emirates designated CAIR as a terrorist organization, citing its links to the Brotherhood and Hamas. And the Brotherhood itself is recognized as a terrorist organization by at least Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Bahrain and Russia. Jordan also banned the Brotherhood earlier this year. Put bluntly: There is absolutely no reason the United States should have a warmer approach toward CAIR than the UAE or a warmer approach toward the Brotherhood than Saudi Arabia.

The first Trump administration flirted with the idea of designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. It was the right impulse. But the effort was ultimately bogged down by internal bureaucracy and international pressure — most notably from Qatar and Turkey, both sometime U.S. partners that harbor strong Brotherhood sympathies and bankroll Islamist causes. 

Critics argue that such a designation would complicate relations with countries where Brotherhood affiliates participate in local politics. But since when did the U.S. place a premium on building alliances with the ideological cousins of Al Qaeda and ISIS?

Moreover, designating the Muslim Brotherhood would empower domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies to go after its networks and financial infrastructure. It would send a clear signal that the U.S. government no longer accepts a claim of “nonviolent Islamism” as a pass when designating terrorist groups.

In a time when the threat from Islamic extremism remains global and decentralized, we can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to the architects of the movement. The Muslim Brotherhood is not, as “Arab Spring” boosters risibly claimed a decade and a half ago, a Western partner in “democracy.” It is the mother’s milk of modern Sunni jihadism.

The question is not whether we can afford to designate Muslim Brotherhood offshoots as terrorist organizations. It is: How much longer can we afford not to?