Why would a Trump supporter attempt to gain access to a secure event with fake passports, fake license plates, fake press credentials, and loaded firearms? The only logical conclusion is that the individual is either mentally unstable or has a deliberate intent to cause harm.
Suspected Trump Assassin
Major Red Flags that Must Be Investigated!
Act for America
Oct 15
The recent arrest of Vem Miller at a Trump rally in California has raised significant concerns about how the legal system is handling serious security breaches. Sheriff Chad Bianco of Riverside County, who publicly stated his belief that his deputies might have thwarted an assassination attempt, is now facing scrutiny over the remarkably light charges filed against the suspect. Despite the sheriff’s dramatic claims, Miller was charged only with two misdemeanors—possessing a loaded weapon and a large capacity magazine—and was released on bail. The question that needs answering is: Why?
Miller’s case involves a combination of dangerous elements that should have merited more severe charges. He was found with multiple passports, fake identification, weapons, and a vehicle with fake license plates while attempting to gain access to a high-security event featuring a former U.S. President. The mere presence of these items at a political rally should have triggered felony charges under California law, but Miller now walks free with a slap on the wrist. Given the circumstances, this isn’t just a minor infraction; it is a serious breach of security that could have had deadly consequences.
In California, Miller could have been charged with multiple felonies, including Unlawful Possession of a Loaded Firearm in Public under California Penal Code § 25850, Possession of a Large-Capacity Magazine under Penal Code § 30600, Forgery for possessing fake passports and IDs under Penal Code § 470 and Driving with a Fake or Stolen License Plate, which can also be charged as a felony under California’s laws related to vehicle registration fraud. Additionally, Impersonating the Press to Gain Access to a Secured Event and Attempted Criminal Entry with Weapons are actions that could warrant federal charges for conspiracy and potential threats to national security.
The fact that none of these more serious charges were brought against Miller begs the question: Is this undercharging due to pressure from federal authorities, or is there a broader systemic issue at play?
Even more concerning is the fact that federal authorities, including the Secret Service, have downplayed the incident, insisting that there was no threat to President Trump. This contradiction between local and federal law enforcement is baffling. If a county sheriff is stating that a third assassination attempt on Trump was likely prevented, why hasn’t the federal government taken more decisive action to charge Miller appropriately?
This case sets a dangerous precedent. When a suspect caught with weapons and fake IDs at a political rally walks away with a minor misdemeanor, it sends the message that serious security threats won’t be treated with the severity they deserve. Californians and all Americans should be asking why this suspect wasn’t charged to the fullest extent of the law. Failure to pursue stronger charges undermines public trust and endangers future events.
Why would a Trump supporter attempt to gain access to a secure event with fake passports, fake license plates, fake press credentials, and loaded firearms? The only logical conclusion is that the individual is either mentally unstable or has a deliberate intent to cause harm. The combination of falsified documents and illegal weapons at a high-security rally is a glaring red flag that demands a full investigation into his motives. Furthermore, it calls for more appropriate criminal charges—the kind any other individual in a similar situation would face.
